Payanam Movie Press Meet Stills,Payanam Cast,Payanam Review,Payanam Movie Wallpapers

Tags: Payanam movie stills, Telugu new movie Payanam picture, Payanam wallpapers, Payanam actress Poonam Kaur stills, Payanam actress Sana Khan stills, Payanam newTelugu movie wallpapers, Payanam movie cast , Payanam movie review , Payanam movie actress , Payanam actor Prakash Raj stills, Payanam leading role Nagarjuna wallpapers, Payanam latest press meet stills, Payanam movie audio launch , Payanam movie successful pressmeet stills, Payanam Telugu latest movie picture.

comments | | Read More...

Dookudu Movie Review

Movie: Dookudu

My Score: 3.75 / 5

Banner: 14 reels Entertainment

Cinematography: Guhan MV / Murella Prasad

Music: S Thaman

Producers: Ram Achanta, Gopichand Achanta and Anil Sunkara

Editing: MR Varma

Dialogues: Kona Venkat

Story: Gopi Mohan

Story, screenplay and direction: Seenu Vytla

Cast: Mahesh Babu, Samantha, Parvati Melton (SA), Sonu Sood, Kota, Brahmanandam, MS Narayana, Sayaji Shinde, Vennela Kishore, Shravan, Ravi Prakash, Ajay, Suman, Nassar, Chandra Mohan, Supreet, Tanikella Bharani, Sudha, Pragati, Sonia, Shafi, and so on.

Release Date: September 23, 2011

Review

History

Narayan Shankar (Prakash Raj) is a political leader and a man of the masses. He wants his son Ajay (Mahesh Babu) to become a political leader. Narayan Shankar is injured in an accident and falls into a coma. Meanwhile, Ajay is growing and will become an aggressive police. Narayan Shankar And suddenly out of coma. The rest of the story is all about how Ajay manages to keep the changes involving his father, and takes revenge on the villains at the same time, with some unconventional tactics.

Performance artists:

Mahesh Babu: Mahesh Babu again demonstrated that he is a principal actor. He has a great heart to allow Brahmanandam to take center stage for a few minutes, although Mahesh that creates this kind of situation. One should have a special touch to the comedy time Seenu Vytla and Mahesh makes it effortless. Mahesh is one of the comedians when with Brahmanandam and MS Narayana. Mahesh Babu has also excelled in the delivery of dialogue through the mixture of accents in scenes of confrontation Telangana villain. Mahesh Babu romance trademark of the fun of it works great in the episodes of Turkey. You see Mahesh to be cheerful and smiling in most parts of the film.

Samantha has a limited role in this film and justice is done. Brahmanandam has a dialogue in the movie - Nannu vaadukondi saar. Seenu Vytla is one of the very few directors used Brahmanandam talent to the fullest extent. All lovers will have another party Brahmanandam in the film where an actor acts a fictional reality show. How Brahmanandam keeps expressions for dialogue "and humanity bheebhatsamaina scene where Nagarjuna Akkineni appeals to his pen camera is priceless. MS Narayana who has excelled as a star of fire in Dubai Seenu has another similar role in he wants to make his debut as hero opposite Genelia. Prakash Raj is a positive role (inspired by PJR) and he is excellent. Vennela Kishore Sastry plays whose grandmother is a guess. Nassar has done a comic role for a difference ..

Technical Departments:

The basic concept of a person into a coma and the son of the person creating artificial atmosphere around is inspired by a German film titled 'Goodbye Lenin! (2003). That German cinema is a serious movie and somewhat boring (for me). The story writer Gopi Mohan use that plot and cast to make an entertaining script. Seenu Vytla main strength has always been entertaining and made sure that there are plenty of characters to create humor. Brahmanandam and MS Narayana used effectively to create broad humor. Mahesh Babu characterization is done right, and director Mahesh Babu has also been shown in a new light comedy with time better. Although the entertainment and action orientation is good, there are ups and downs in the graph of the narrative because the runtime and the number of characters. Screenplay of the film is good. The techniques used in the script Prakash Raj to take revenge without knowing it and show Brahmanandam crazy real estate is certainly going to generate more commercial appreciation. Among all the characters, I think the character is not well recorded Suman. It would have been more powerful if the hero is introduced through the words of another character, not by Suman. And Suman's death is not justifiable. The following aspects of the brand of Seenu Vytla

1. Mahesh Babu: heroin in Istanbul jokes n Brahmanandam and MS Narayana Make Bakr.

2. Brahmanandam: appeal to vote via SMS and a call to Nagarjuna Akkineni

3. MS Narayana: Showreel (Yamadonga, Magadheera, Robo and Simha) and the episode nalukapaina macha. Of course the same MS Narayana did an episode of the comedy in photo shoot Sontham Seenu Vytla in the past.

Kona Venkat Dialogues and written by Seenu Vytla are good. These dialogues and dialogues masala mood of heroism. Music by Thaman has already become a chartbuster and background music is nice. Photography by KV Guhan and Prasad Murella complements the story. Edited by Varma is adequate. The trio of producers (Ram Achanta, Gopichand Achanta and Anil Sunkara) have spent a lot of money and the entire film is shot in extravagant style.

Highlights:

Mahesh Babu Performance

Brahmi, M S Narayana comedy

First half

40 minutes Last

Parvathi Melton theme song

Vaitla Comedy Time

History

Disadvantages:

Characterizations villain

Mahesh Babu MLA getting wasted

Final analysis:

First half of the film sets the plot and it is entertaining. There are ups and downs in the second half, but the entertainment provided by Mahesh Babu, Brahmanandam and MS Narayana is responsible for it. The positives are the charm Mahesh Babu, Seenu Vytla time comedy and a dash viable. On the other hand, there is some redundancy in the characterization of villain. Mahesh Babu gives an artist universally acceptable in the form of Dookudu after an interval of five years. Go see him.

Trade Talk: It's a long time that a Telugu film star speaks very positive on the first day. It bodes well for the Telugu film industry that is literally feeding on Tamil films named in this year so far. With the star power Mahesh Babu is no limit for a film can be achieved with positive talk. Wait and see how the great success of the records in the days ahead.

comments | | Read More...

Oosaravelli Movie Review - Don’t Expect a Brand NTR Film!

Movie: Oosaravelli

My Rating: 2.75 / 5

Banner: Sri Venkateshwara Cine Chitra

Cinematography: Rasool Ellora

Music: Devi Sri Prasad

Producer: BVSN Prasad

Editing: Goutham Raju

History: Vamshi Vakkantham

Address: Surender Reddy

Cast: NTR Jr, Tamannah, Shaam, Payal Ghosh, Prakash Raj, Jayaprakash, Raghubabu, MS Narayana, etc..

Release Date: October 6, 2011

Review

History

Tony (NTR) is a street thug in Mumbai to do anything for money and is now in Hyderabad.

It seems Niharika (Tamannah) falls in love with her. After an initial yes and no, Niharika also falls for Tony. Meanwhile, Tony joined the band of Sarkar (Jayaprakash Reddy) and through a sequence of events coming in (Prakash Raj) of the Mafia Don Azzu Bhai brother.

However, starts killing them one by one and this leads to a conflict between him and Niharika. However, the mission of killing Tony is everything for a reason and has a long flashback. What is this flashback? How Niharika involved in that? What are the different features of Tony? All this forms the rest of the story.

Performance artists:

Junior NTR meets with reasonable performance. The undervalued compared to their natural instincts histrionics. He was good at dancing and delivering punch dialogues few.

Tamannah has come up with a paper based on performance. Overall, she did a decent job. The glamorous wanted treatment has not worked this time. But she shone and a couple of songs.

Prakash Raj has done this several times. For a change, comes only during the second half, but only if he is there, making its presence felt.

Payal Ghosh has a meaty role and made good use of it. Jayaprakash Reddy and Sarkar brought smiles with his dialogue delivery. Raghu Babu was just as fun as Shiva chain.

Shaam came and went, the same with Sayaji Shinde. Rahman was clean. Narayana M S was competent. Murali Sharma did not use their full potential. The other artists just make your much needed and fills the screen.

Highlights:

* First semester

* Recorded NTR character

Disadvantages:

* The second half

* Driven Sequences

* Stereotype climax

* The lack of conviction in the key scenes

* Media of Music

Final analysis:

Surender Reddy proved himself as an action and the director of entertainment with 'Kick' so the expectations were high in this case.

The positive pre-release hype that was making the rounds, everything seemed on track. And seeing the first half makes you feel like you can wait another super hit. The explosion range raises the stakes.

But things start to spiral downward during the second half. As such, the director's thought process is understood, but was unable to conceive with the right fist on the screen. Missed freshness in narration. Scissors had worked well in the second half, would become a better film.

Some fluctuations are easily observed and can feel the drag. The good side of the film is the difference in treatment with the script and give a lift to the character of the heroine. However, due to the lack of depth in some scenes, few situations happen lightly.

For fans of NTR, this will be a different treatment. Except one or two high-octane dialogues, most of his character is to guess and unpredictable.

If manufacturers had focused on increasing the comedy track in the second half, along with providing a compelling climax fight sequences, the film would have been much better.

Bottomline: Do not expect a film of NTR Brand! It is up to the mark

comments | | Read More...

Pilla Jamindar Movie Review

Movie: Pilla Jamindar

Rating: 2.75 / 5

Banner: S S Cinemas

Director of Photography: Sai Sriram

Editing: Praveen Pudi

Lyrics of Krishna Chaitanya

Dialogues: Chandra Shekar

Art: Mani Varma

Music: Selvaganesh

Producers: D Rao S, S S Buchibabu

Story, screenplay and direction: G Ashok

Cast: Nani, Haripriya, Bindu Madhavi, etc. Avasarala Srinivas.

Release Date: October 14, 2011

Review

History

PJ (Nani) is the careless and carefree young man who is full of arrogance and ego. The reason for this is his confidence that he would be heir of the R 5000 crores of property once it becomes a major.

In this process, which mistreats his servants and does not care much about your friends too. It becomes one. Major PJ, and when he feels ready to take ownership of his grandfather (Nagineedu) states that the property may be given subject to few conditions first is, PJ should become a grade and he must live in a hostel pocket money.

Reluctantly, the PJ has the status and begins a new journey. In this process, we know the value of friends (Avasarala Srinivas, Ramesh Tagubothu etc), love in the form of Sindhu (Haripriya) and other important elements of humanity. How come the rest is history.

Performance artists:

Nani has come up with a spirited performance and shows the versatility of your body language. There are some scenes where it was hard, but overall did a good job.

Haripriya is very seductive. Although his role was underestimated, makes its presence felt with her natural sensuality. She has a good potential to be drawn.

Bindu Madhavi had a brief role. Apart from one or two songs and filling the screens of some scenes that did not have much to do. But it has to look nice you can enjoy on screen.

Ramesh Ravu was his own intensity. Your typical dialogue delivery and expressions gives a strong screen presence.

Avasarala Srinivas has made a valuable contribution to their role. His approach to the role is very natural and gels with the flow in a nice way. He is a talent that deserves better opportunities.

MS Narayana was impressive again Nagineedu was natural, SIVAPRASAD was standard, Vennela Kishore brought smiles, the gang of friends made by the actor lean Tagubothu Ramesh and others gave a fair share of smiles.

Highlights:

* First semester

* Comedy

* Nativity factor

* Script

Disadvantages:

* The second half

* An overdose of feelings

* Graphic weak key emotional scenes

* Slow pace at some points

Final analysis:

The film comes across as a field trip from the start. The focus is more on human values ​​and nature to the land of the smaller places. The feeling is very different due to the technique of script and you can get an idea of ​​Vamsi's films in some sequences.

Credit must be given to artists to fill the film with his energetic humor. There are some good points in the essence of education, the values ​​of humanity. The film could have been much stronger if the same force and flavor are added to the second part instead of filling melodrama too.

In general, this is a film that has a number of reasons to be seen. Have patience in the second half and will leave with a smile.

comments | | Read More...

7th Sense Movie Review

Film: Sense seventh

My Rating: 2.25 / 5

Banner: Lakshmi Ganapathi Films, Red Giant Movies

Photography: Ravi K. Chandran

Music: Harris Jayaraj

Producers: Rupesh, Balasubramaniam, Udhayanidhi

Editing: Antonio

Story, screenplay and direction: A Murugadoss R

Cast: Suriya, Shruti Haasan, Johnny Tri etc.

Release Date: October 26, 2011

Review

History

In the 16th century, a Pallava king, Bodhidharma (Suriya) sets out on a trip to China. It is equipped with martial arts, the art of healing and indomitable control over the five elements.

After arriving in China, which cures a disease people and because of the belief of the locals, who sacrificed his life and is buried there. Cut to the present, there Aravind (Suriya), a circus performer who comes through Shuba (Shruti), student of genetic research and falls for her. However, Shuba be kind to Aravind for a reason. Meanwhile, a Chinese named Dong Lee (Johnny Tri) comes to India and its mission is to kill Shuba.

Who is Aravind? Why Shuba want to be kind to him? Why is Lee Dong Shuba kill? All this forms the rest of the story.

Performance artists:

Suriya unfolds its charm once more, and it's all about the movie. More than his regular role as Aravind was his brief role as Bodhidharma, which creates a strong impact.

Shruti Haasan for natural beauty and has a magical glow in his eyes. She's a role she became flesh and justice for it. If you add a few extra kilos that will be very attractive.

Johnny Tri was excellent. His intense eyes and his body language was threatening. Without much dialogue, which conveys the essence of a villain in the right way.

Dhanya was fine Pakru Guinness was a bit silly, Avinash was fit, there is little Abhinaya, Ashwin was fine, Raghavendra came and went. The others did not have much to offer.

Highlights:

* The concept of the film

* Performance Suriya

* Technical and production values

Disadvantages:

* Slow

* Weak follow-up of romance

* Driven Sequences

* The lack of intensity and emotional depth

* Music

Final analysis:

Murugadoss has mixed a little real history of modern science in this. For starters, it must be appreciated by coming up with a bold theme and make an attempt to show the great history and great men of our nation. However, there is a fine line between taking a good concept and execution with the correct voltage. If not for the aura Suriya and strong technical values, the film would have been smoother.

This film seems to be the idea of ​​a quality manager run by a director of class B. Generally people expect something more sensible from the Murugudoss. But lacking here.

The first half is good, but the second half was derailed. Murugudoss made vain attempt to control the narrative due to lack of proper investigation. Even the idea of ​​red operation became silly. The climax is very long, with 40 minutes and shows how bad the script is.

You can say that there is brilliance as a director of the plot was predictable and all that was required was to fill the two hours longer. There is no doubt that this is a fairly unique history in recent times, but only if you cut the right way and a certain amount of excitement and dramatic values ​​were added to it, the movie would have been a success.

At the box office, the openings will be good, but the audience is advised to enter the theater with no expectations. In general, this would have no positive impact at the box office. .

Bottom line: the beautiful thought, bad execution

comments | | Read More...

Nuvvila Movie Review

Movie: Nuvvila

My Rating: 3.5

Banner: Usha Kiron Movies

Cinematography: Sudhakar Reddy

Music: Shekar Chandra

Producer: Ramoji Rao

Edition: Venkatesh K Marthanda

Story, screenplay and direction: Ravi Babu

Cast: Ajay, Havish, Yami Gautam Prasad, Remy Nambeesan etc.

Release Date: November 3, 2011

Review

History

This is a story of three young-Anand (Ajay) is a type of good heart who tends to have an element of confusion each time. Mahesh (Havish) is an aspiring model and want to achieve something big.

Raja (Prasad) is an aspiring musician and wants to become a great violinist. The trio became friends, since I work at the pizza itself. Now Anand is in love with Archana (Yami) but never expressed it directly. Mahesh has a fight with his girlfriend Madhavi (Sarayu) and gets chased by a secret admirer.

Raja believes his partner from school Rani (Remy) and bad luck for him. The story takes a turn when he finds Archana Anand is in love with another person, Mahesh gets caught with a gay (Haleem) and ends up marrying Raja Rani. What happens from there forms the rest of the story.

Performance artists:

Ajay has come up with a decent performance, but could have shown little more energy, although their role is sober. In general, made an interpretation contained.

Havish brought smiles. He is handsome and has shown confidence with body language comfortable, but you need to work on his dialogue delivery. Of course, it suited him here in this paper.

Prasad was a show stealer. More cute in appearance and energy levels showing. Moreover, being an actor in Mumbai has been called by his own voice is welcome.

Yami was really delicious. She is a perfect package for an attractive, sparkling energy and glamor good. She was just as good when it comes to emotional scenes. She has a great potential.

Remy is the highest level between the main cast. She has done her role with elegance and looks nice. She has an attractive confidence before the camera and can take on challenging roles.

Sarayu was short but has a good sex appeal and is a familiar face to television viewers. His eyes are expressive and led to his role with ease.

Ravi Babu was there for a little entertainment. Haleem was good. Deva was fine. Sudhakar Raju was matured. Radha Kumari was funny. The others did their bit as required and added value.

Highlights:

Proceedings of the main cast

Narrative

Comedy

Good pace

Disadvantages:

Anticlimax

Logical gaps in the writing

The lack of brand actors

Few concepts cross boundaries

Final analysis:

Ravi Babu is a filmmaker who is convinced that most of the actors is the story that is very important. Therefore, the quality of content in his films is usually good. Of course, not to say that comes with variety. It's the same formula, but full of a different and fun. As such it is a good storyteller and at the same time, a skilled technician.

Above all, he is aware of how to tap the pulse of the public university is going. And given the low costs involved in their projects, which is obviously a good choice for a few producers.

While all this on one hand, there comes a time when a filmmaker who should seek to justify the concept and the reason behind the plot. For example,

The track between Ajay-Yami speaks of parents is very open mind. This would have been convincing if the parents had made a note of compromise rather than a welcome note.

There are cases where it is obvious to the audience that the film is made on a shoestring budget. This tends to hinder the production values.

In general, this is a film that has a good entertainment masala ingredients necessary and sufficient to keep the audience engrossed throughout the movie. As viewers, all kinds of them are connected to it easily. Given the budget and the cost of making the film certainly rake in profits and this will be a very successful business at the box office. But then it is time for the main cast to come and do the promotion after release.

comments | | Read More...

Mogudu Movie Review

Movie: Mogudu

My Rating: 2.25 / 5

Banner: Lakshmi Narasimha Productions

Director of photography: Srikanth

Music: Shankar Babu

Editing: Gautam Raju

Producer Bujji Nallamalapu

Story, screenplay and direction: Krishna Vamsi

Cast: Gopichand, Rajendra Prasad, Taapsee, Shraddha Das, Red, etc. Naresh.

Release Date: November 4, 2011

Review

History

Anjaneya Prasad (Rajendra Prasad) is a self-made man, and after much struggle becomes successful. He brings her children with loving care and the family unit as strength. His son Bujji (Gopichand) is loved by all.

Bujji is also a man of ideals and believes in the essence of marriage as a lifelong commitment. His life takes a turn when you see Rajeshwari (Taapsee) and very quickly fall in love. Mother of Rajeshwari (Red) is a politician.

The initial process is smooth, but moments after the marriage takes place, a collision between the traditions of the families carried the fight. This leads to Bujji and Rajeshwari goes for the divorce. The misunderstanding is further enhanced due to certain incidents. However, both Rajeshwari Bujji and love one another. They do not join? What about families? All this forms the rest of the story.

Performance artists:

Gopichand has arrived with a soft, subdued performance, and this is something that your fans would like to see, but did everything possible to give a mature and balanced act.

It's good to see Rajendra Prasad in a long-term role and that too in a very effective way. Although his role was not recorded correctly, that has taken a courageous act.

Taapsee is the thief of show. She is sexy, energetic and has taken his role with aplomb. The dubbing was done not so perfect, but it is natural to some extent.

Shraddha plays the typical sacrifice goes a little glamor, if necessary. But she has developed the ease and confidence in their expressions and body language.

Red was strong as usual and most of his dialogues, which is its expression, which were suitable. Naresh was natural and made his presence felt. Support artists in the form of Pragati, Raghava, Harshavardhan, Lakshmi Bhargavi, a friend of Taapsee, Gitanjali were there to fill the screen and the dose necessary emotional. Venu Madhav was fine.

Highlights:

Shraddha Das * and Taapsee

* Music

* Songs picturization

* The technical values

Disadvantages:

* Poor script

* The second half

* Tips unwanted emotions

* Recorded inconsistent characters

* Predictability

* The lack of depth in key scenes

Final analysis:

Krishna Vamsi is a talented storyteller and a technician of great prestige. Therefore, it is natural to have high expectations in his films. Given the fact that it was a film about family bonding, some hoped would be another "Murari. However, there is a difference between day and night. The main reason for the film to suffer is a weak script. Taking cinematic liberties is fine, but not to the point where the audience is stunned. Here are some cases that resulted in the audience totally disconnected from the film

Taapsee brought home drunk and the next day Gopi is considered a traditional girl and welcomed with open arms. These things are not common in regular families Telugu.

The chain reaction of blows between Gopichand and Taapsee families. KV tried to bring an intense emotion, but turned out to be a comedy.

Rajendra Prasad to be an older person receives all prepared with a knife and runs to the Red house with revenge. That's absurd about his image and characterization.

The conversation between Red mandiram Taapsee in bid to sleep with their husbands. That was cheap.

Since I was being tested as a gift from the family order, the dialogues that have brought the number of times to display mutes the flavor of raunchiness.

As such, the idea of ​​going out with the value of marriage, the importance of family is all good, but there is a way you have to run and Krishna Vamsi has failed this time.

At the box office, the film will be very difficult to survive. The only consolation is Taapsee, you can only get some people.

comments | | Read More...

Oh My Friend Movie Review

Movie: Oh My Friend

My Rating: 3.5

Banner: Sree Venkateshwara Creations

Cinematography: Vijay K Chakravarthy

Music: Rahul Raj

Producer: Dil Raju

BGM: Manisharma

Story, screenplay and direction: Vijay K Chakravarthy

Cast: Siddharth, Shruthi Haasan, Hansika, Navadeep, Tanikella Bharani. Ali, Raghu Babu, Sana, and so on.

Release Date: November 11, 2011

Review

History

Chandu (Sidz) and Siri (Shruti) are friends since childhood and are close friends. While Syria is a very planned girl with the clarity of thought, Chandu is not interested in studies that want to become a rock star. This is not going well with Chandu's father (Bharani), but he takes it in stride.

The story takes a turn when he meets Ritu Chandu (Hansika) and falls for her. Soon, he manages to win her heart. Meanwhile, Uday Siri is committed (Navadeep).

The story takes a turn when the close union between Chandu-Siri begins to cause discomfort to their partners. On the other hand, elderly people feel both Chandu and Siri are really in love but do not realize. Is it really love? Or just friends? How does the story of his life takes a turn is the essence.

Performance artists:

Siddarth is used to doing these tasks, but in this film, which is expected to look young for what he did everything possible to do so. His acting was natural and scored brownie points in the emotional climax scene.

Shruti Haasan never had so good a character in his career. A simple girl who is willing to do anything for her friend, who brings with her performance. The actor sees it through this movie.

Navadeep is seen with a few shades of character "Arya 2 '. Even his performance was good.

The weakest link in the cast is Hansika. She has lost lots of weight and cute charm that could have been better if there was a new face in place.

Tanikella Bharani was awesome, the comedy was well-Ali, Raghu Babu has come and gone, Sana was standard. The others did not have much margin.

Highlights:

* Music and songs

* Photography

Siddarth-performance Shruti *

Disadvantages:

* A three-dimensional history

* The lack of comedy

Final analysis:

Dil Raju movies are known for the technical values ​​so that even this film is rich in that. Vibrant colors, mood photography etc make their mark. But real life is music and film songs.

The dialogues are written by the director and who have been good in places. While he handles all departments and could not do so in writing.

But he was good at getting the right emotions at key moments effectively. Any film Dil Raju, even if it is a blow is lost in the visible, which is entertainment.

Because the narrative dimension, the scope of entertainment was not focused. Although Ali was there, that did not work much. As usual, the film tackles the issue facing young people, but in the end, the emotional feeling is that the sense of entertainment.

Because of this, one can expect very different reactions depending on the personal experiences of each person. If only the entertainment value was added, the film would have been a sure shot gift. Dil Raju may have to rely on post-release publicity for that.

comments | | Read More...

Sri Ramarajyam Movie Review

Movie: Sri Ramarajyam

My Rating: 3.5 / 5 (Updated)

Banner: Sri Sai Baba Movies

Cinematographer: Raju

Music: Ilayaraja

Editing: GG Krishna

Art: Ravinder S (Valmiki Set)

Dialogues: Ramana

Producer: Sai Babu Yalamanchali

Written and Directed by: Bapu

Cast: Nandamuri Bala Krishna, ANR, Nayanatara, Srikanth, Sameer, Balayya, Murali Mohan, Dhara Singh Vinda, Sudha, Sana, KR Vijaya, Siva Parvathy, Jhansi, Hema, etc..

Release Date: November 17, 2011

Review

History

Seeta becomes pregnant and wants to offer baby in Ayodhya itself. Almost when everything was happy in Ayodhya, Rama comes to know that people are arguing about Seeta is held hostage for a year in Lanka and gossip about the possibilities out there. Deeply concerned about the gossip, Seeta Rama sent away from the forests. She will Ashramam Valmiki in the woods and offers the twins - Kusha and Lava. The rest of the story is all about how Kusha, Lava Rama and Seeta join.

Performance artists:

Nandamuri Bala Krishna: Bala Krishna deserves a huge applause for accepting this script. Bala Krishna is probably one of the few actors in Telugu film industry today that can do justice to the mythological roles. But the role of Rama in this film is about the subtlety and emotion. Need peace and measuring performance. Bala Krishna has done a wonderful role. Since the story is more about Seeta go into the woods and the twins, there is enough footage for these three characters and Krishna Bala required. Bala Krishna portrays the inner turmoil Lord Rama went really well. Bala Krishna has always been open to all kinds of scripts and functions. And this is the best film of Bala Krishna after the gender Dweepam Bhairava mythological.

ANR is an asset to the film as Valmiki, which helps Seeta and guidance at a critical time. Nayana Tara is perfect as Seeta. She portrays herself graciously to bring holiness to it. She performed fabulously. The entire film is about characters and Lava Kusha. Both children who made these two characters together with bullet Hanuman. Srikanth has the role of Lakshmana and this film will be a feather in the cap. He is excellent. Sameer has portrayed Bharat and it's nice. Brahmanandam played a key role to change history. Red has the role of Bhudevi (mother Seeta). KR Vijaya, Balayya, Murali Mohan, Subbaraya Sharma, Sudha, Hema, Sana, Jhansi etc Siva Parvathy did very well in other important functions.

Technical Departments:

The story of the film is based on the classic "Lavakusha. Director Bapu, who has made many films adapted social stories Ramayana is said that he has every right in this movie. Screenplay of the film is very good. The way when children honor their father not knowing that he is his father, is a technique powerful script. Bapu has drawn the kind of performances to all stakeholders. There is humor in the characterizations of Lava, Kusha and Hanuman bullet. It is very difficult to run a mythological film 2 hours and 45 minutes long and Bapu has said that emotions worked. You sympathize with the characters and the evidence LavaKusha Seeta and Rama happening.

Music by Ilayaraja is excellent. I loved all the issues, even before its release. All these songs are uniquely mounted on the screen. Background music is gentle and appropriate. Ramana dialogues are good and clear that the current generation can understand without any difficulty. Cinematography by Raju is another asset. Four units (EFX, Pixelloid, Makuta and another company) have worked in visual effects and have done a fabulous job. Art direction is excellent. Ravinder has come up with a good set of Valmiki Ashramam. Costumes and makeup are natural. The edition is fine. A person should get 100% credit of this film is Yalamanchali Sai Babu. It's a very risky proposition to make a film like Sri Ramarajyam. Sai Babu blindly entrusted to his team and spent a lot of money to reach a high quality product.

Final analysis:

First half is good. The second half is emotional. The film really picks up in terms of emotions of the scene where Seeta is left in the forest. Bala Krishna and Sai Babu farmer should receive great credit for the risk you have taken. In an age where the success of a film is measured by the punch dialogue, dances, fights and comedy bramhanandam, Sri Ramarajyam is a refreshing and brave film tells the story as a story. After seeing this movie - two people have an enormous respect - Bala Krishna and Sai Babu producer. This film has music, images, emotions and actions in the right proportions. Bapu comes with an interesting and sensitive film in the form of Sri Ramarajyam. Go see it!

comments | | Read More...